Seagate One Touch 5TB External HDD Speed Test and Benchmark

By | April 27, 2023

So i recently got a seage one touch 5tb hdd to store my gameplay recordings. The exact model is this: STKZ5000401

In this post we shall be doing some speed tests on this drive to see how it performs. This is a usb connected external hdd, and uses USB 3.0 interface (which is also usb 3.2gen1).

To benchmark the speed of this drive we shall be using the tool called CrystalDiskMark and run only few tests. The tests can be useful to get an idea on how this drive compares with other storage solutions like nvme, sata ssds in external enclosures and usb flash drives as well.

As of now the datasheets for this product series is available at the following links:

https://www.seagate.com/www-content/datasheets/pdfs/one-touch-pw-DS2066-2102-GB-en_AS.pdf

We use USB Device Tree Viewer to ensure that the drive is connected using usb 3.0 protocol.

Seagate One Touch 5TB USB Device Tree Viewer

Seagate One Touch 5TB USB Device Tree Viewer

Benchmark tests

Next we run the tests using CrystalDiskMark. The drive was connected to my Acer Swift 3 laptop which had a USB-C 3.2 gen 2 port.

Here are the approximate speed numbers rounded for brevity:

Drive Seq Read (MB/s) Seq Write (MB/s) Random Read (MB/s) Random Write (MB/s)
Seagate One Touch 5TB 130 130 1 5

Since this is not nvme, we shall use Settings > Default which applies to any kind of hard disk drive. We also Set Profile > Default.

Seage One Touch 5TB CrystalDiskMark

Seage One Touch 5TB CrystalDiskMark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 8.0.4 x64 (C) 2007-2021 hiyohiyo
                                  Crystal Dew World: https://crystalmark.info/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

[Read]
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  8, T= 1):   137.300 MB/s [    130.9 IOPS] < 60635.37 us>
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  1, T= 1):   135.418 MB/s [    129.1 IOPS] <  7734.12 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1):     1.160 MB/s [    283.2 IOPS] <109534.11 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q=  1, T= 1):     0.434 MB/s [    106.0 IOPS] <  9400.87 us>

[Write]
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  8, T= 1):   131.306 MB/s [    125.2 IOPS] < 63304.29 us>
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  1, T= 1):   130.494 MB/s [    124.4 IOPS] <  8017.10 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1):     6.966 MB/s [   1700.7 IOPS] < 18762.17 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q=  1, T= 1):     4.590 MB/s [   1120.6 IOPS] <   890.08 us>

Profile: Default
   Test: 1 GiB (x5) [E: 33% (1539/4657GiB)]
   Mode: [Admin]
   Time: Measure 5 sec / Interval 5 sec 
   Date: 2023/04/23 15:28:43
     OS: Windows 10  [10.0 Build 19045] (x64)

Round 2

We run the test once again to be sure of the results.

Seagate One Touch 5TB CrystalDiskMark

Seagate One Touch 5TB CrystalDiskMark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 8.0.4 x64 (C) 2007-2021 hiyohiyo
                                  Crystal Dew World: https://crystalmark.info/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

[Read]
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  8, T= 1):   133.017 MB/s [    126.9 IOPS] < 62588.71 us>
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  1, T= 1):   131.688 MB/s [    125.6 IOPS] <  7949.42 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1):     1.213 MB/s [    296.1 IOPS] <105356.99 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q=  1, T= 1):     0.438 MB/s [    106.9 IOPS] <  9307.80 us>

[Write]
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  8, T= 1):   130.638 MB/s [    124.6 IOPS] < 63639.07 us>
  SEQ    1MiB (Q=  1, T= 1):   128.331 MB/s [    122.4 IOPS] <  8151.24 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1):     6.930 MB/s [   1691.9 IOPS] < 18854.74 us>
  RND    4KiB (Q=  1, T= 1):     4.566 MB/s [   1114.7 IOPS] <   895.29 us>

Profile: Default
   Test: 1 GiB (x5) [E: 33% (1539/4657GiB)]
   Mode: [Admin]
   Time: Measure 5 sec / Interval 5 sec 
   Date: 2023/04/23 15:37:57
     OS: Windows 10  [10.0 Build 19045] (x64)

File Copy Paste Test

Another very simple test is to copy files to and from the drive and note down the transfer speed as reported by windows. We shall be using a large file of about 4GB size, and this test basically is a sequential read/write operation.

Write to drive

First we tried writing a large file to this hdd and here is what the speed looks like

Seagate One Touch 5TB Copy Write

Seagate One Touch 5TB Copy Write

Read from drive

Next we tried copying a file FROM this hdd to laptop and here is what the speed looked like:

Seagate One Touch 5TB Copy Read

Seagate One Touch 5TB Copy Read

In both cases the speed capped at around 125 MB/s which is nearly the practical speed limit for this device.

Can we use it for game recording ?

So I was playing fortnite and the average fps was around 120 and resolution 1920x1080. So doing some calculations we can find the bitrate required for recording the screen onto this external hdd.

120 frames per second x (1920 x 1080 pixels) x (3 rgb bytes per pixel) = 746,496,000 bytes per second = 746 MB/s

The number 746 MB/s is clearly much higher than what the seagate hdd can sustain even in sequential write modes ( 130 MB/s). But note that video recording uses encoding to compress the video on the fly and it clearly does not produce that huge amount of data.

I am using OBS Studio to record the gameplay with the "High Quality, Medium File Size" quality preset.

OBS Studio Gameplay Recording Settings

OBS Studio Gameplay Recording Settings

The output video has the following size:

Size (KB) Length Bitrate (MB/s)
7565745 1282 5.763
6592312 1117 5.763

As can be seen above, the required bitrate for writing the video to a drive is just 5.763 MB/s which is within the speed limits of this seagate external hard drive. Hence we can use it for recording gameplays

A better option is to record to a much faster external ssd and then copy those recordings to this hdd for backup sake.

Now the situation will be different for other games that do not require high fps. For example age of empires can run comfortably at 20-30 fps in which case it can be recorded.

Conclusion

The whole purpose of external hdd is to provide lowest cost per gb of storage. Whereas ssds are meant to provide high read and write speed for applications that need it. These include recording live videos and transcoding them.

At around $150 this drive offers 5 TB of storage which works out to less than 0.03 per GB of storage. This makes it an budget option for using as a backup solution for large amounts of data. Above all this is a compact sized lightweight hard disk which makes it easy to carry around along with a laptop.

Category: Tech
About Silver Moon

A Tech Enthusiast, Blogger, Linux Fan and a Software Developer. Writes about Computer hardware, Linux and Open Source software and coding in Python, Php and Javascript. He can be reached at [email protected].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *