<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to use Collectl to monitor system resources on Linux / Ubuntu	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.binarytides.com/collectl-monitor-system-resources-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.binarytides.com/collectl-monitor-system-resources-linux/</link>
	<description>News, Technology, Entertainment and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2023 13:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mark seger		</title>
		<link>https://www.binarytides.com/collectl-monitor-system-resources-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-66006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark seger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binarytides.com/?p=6282#comment-66006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.binarytides.com/collectl-monitor-system-resources-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-65954&quot;&gt;Patrickbull&lt;/a&gt;.

I hear what you&#039;re saying about windows, but when I wrote collectl the actual focus was on High Performance Computing and at the time that meant linux.  Believe it or not I did fiddle around with some of the windows performance counters and even hacked up something that would read the counters and then call the collectl print routines.  And it sort of worked, but there are just so many existing tools for windows I figured we didn&#039;t need another and I didn&#039;t want to distract myself with dealing with yet a whole other operating system.


A personal philosophy I&#039;ve tried to live by with collectl is to &#039;do a couple of things real well rather than a lot of things that are just mediocre&#039; and so there are no GUIs for collectl and no centralized cluster monitoring.  Collectl&#039;s focus is on gathering/logging metrics efficiently and making them available for others to consume via a plugin mechanism and by making them available over a socket.


-mark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.binarytides.com/collectl-monitor-system-resources-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-65954">Patrickbull</a>.</p>
<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying about windows, but when I wrote collectl the actual focus was on High Performance Computing and at the time that meant linux.  Believe it or not I did fiddle around with some of the windows performance counters and even hacked up something that would read the counters and then call the collectl print routines.  And it sort of worked, but there are just so many existing tools for windows I figured we didn&#8217;t need another and I didn&#8217;t want to distract myself with dealing with yet a whole other operating system.</p>
<p>A personal philosophy I&#8217;ve tried to live by with collectl is to &#8216;do a couple of things real well rather than a lot of things that are just mediocre&#8217; and so there are no GUIs for collectl and no centralized cluster monitoring.  Collectl&#8217;s focus is on gathering/logging metrics efficiently and making them available for others to consume via a plugin mechanism and by making them available over a socket.</p>
<p>-mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrickbull		</title>
		<link>https://www.binarytides.com/collectl-monitor-system-resources-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-65954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrickbull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binarytides.com/?p=6282#comment-65954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So the tool is able to monitor only Linux? i think that it is much better to add the function of being able to work with Window as well as there are a lot of people who are with Windows and they will be attracted to it. For example, the tool Anturis, offers many options  and that is why people are attracted to it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the tool is able to monitor only Linux? i think that it is much better to add the function of being able to work with Window as well as there are a lot of people who are with Windows and they will be attracted to it. For example, the tool Anturis, offers many options  and that is why people are attracted to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
